broj: 7-8/2016
pdf (13,65 MB) |
|
RIJEČ UREDNIŠTVA | ||
Uredništvo | ||
WHO DECIDES WHAT IS SCIENCE AND WHAT IS NOT SCIENCE? pdf HR EN | 325 | |
EDITORIAL Reacting to the Editorial published in the Forestry Journal No 3-4/2016, Ivan Pavelić, MSc, President of the Management Board of Croatian Forests Ltd, sent an e-mail to the President and Secretary of the Croatian Forestry Association, in which he stressed that „the Management Board does not wish to get involved in „idle prattle“ and „score-settling“ under the pretence of science. In other words, we will not continue to financially support your so-called scientific journal“. We will not follow suit of the gentleman in question and give our opinion on this email, unlike the gentleman in question, who failed to use arguments to answer the questions raised in our text and remove all doubts if they are groundless. We would first like to clarify the scientific status of the journal. According to the decree of the Croatian Ministry of Information No. 523-91-2 of 3rd March 1991 and the decree of the Ministry of Science and Technology of 2000, the Forestry Journal is denoted as a scientific journal. To say what is and what is not scientific, particularly in the biotechnological sciences, requires some references, which Mr Pavelić, judging from his manner of management, does not possess. Neither does he possess professional references for managing such a demanding economic branch, whose primary goal should not be the production of wood mass only. The scientific status of the journal is confirmed by articles cited from relevant international scientific journals, and more recently, by the important Impact Factor, which further exemplifies the high quality of the journal. The Forestry Journal is not only a scientific magazine; it is a scientific-specialist and professional journal of the Croatian Forestry Association, as stated in its sub headline. This means that all the texts are based on exclusively scientific-specialist and professional foundations rather than on political ones. The questions raised in the subject text were not „concocted“ by the Journal’s Editorial Board. The Editorial Board only formulated the opinion of the profession via the CFA Management Board, which is also the Journal’s Editorial Council. The Editorial Council is comprised of presidents of 19 branches (who were not appointed by the Headquarters but were elected from a membership of about 3,000 members in all), and of representatives of the Faculty of Forestry, Academy of Forestry Sciences, the Croatian Forest Research Institute, HKIŠDT (Croatian Chamber of Forestry and Wood Technology Engineers) and the competent Ministry. The above confirms the unquestionable status of competences. Moreover, the list can further be widened by members of the Editorial Board who are specialists in different scientific-specialist fields. Mr Pavelić does not have to answer all the questions raised in the journal because he is a representative of the state „concessionaire“, who has been entrusted with the administration and management of the national treasure and who should be supervised by the competent Ministry throughout his term of office. Whether the competent Ministry has done so or is doing so, and whether those responsible in the Ministry and the Government of the Republic of Croatia are aware of what has been „sacrificed“ in order to achieve the glorified profit „on paper“ and probably obtain managers’ bonuses remains doubtful. As for the bonuses, a topic on which much has been written in different media, it is interesting to point out that the discussions focused only on whether the distribution of so-called profit should have involved all those employed in the company Croatian Forests Ltd. Not one word was said about the enormous damage inflicted on the forests and forestland by inadequate forest management. No one, not even forestry engineers, union members, sought answers to the questions raised in the Editorial of Forestry Journal 3-4/2016, which so incensed the arrogant President of the Management Board of Croatian Forests Ltd Regarding the financial support to the journal, we should just point out that this is not financial support but subscription to the journal. By declaring his decision, the gentleman in question concludes that forestry experts do not need life-ling learning and cancels the subscription, thus becoming the first manager to do so after 140 years of the publication of the Journal, precisely in the year in which we celebrate this important anniversary. To sum up, the questions raised in the journal are not the topic of „street chit-chat or coffee shop small talk“, as Mr Pavelić says. On the contrary, it is the topic that requires serious and qualified discussions at the highest scientific-specialist and political level. After all, what is at stake here is national treasure of immeasurable value. Editorial Bord | ||
IZVORNI ZNANSTVENI ČLANCI | ||
Damir DRVODELIĆ, Milan ORŠANIĆ, Vinko PAULIĆ | UDK 630* 164 (001) | |
IMPACT OF ECTOMYCORRHIZA AND HUMIC ACIDS ON MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF 1 YEAR OLD SEEDLINGS OF Paulownia tomentosa x Paulownia fortunei HYBRIDS pdf HR EN | 327 | |
Kristijan TOMLJANOVIĆ, Ante SELETKOVIĆ, Maja MALNAR, Marijan GRUBEŠIĆ | UDK 630* 156 (001) | |
AN ERROR ANALYSIS OF HUNTERS IN ESTIMATING THE TARGET DISTANCE pdf HR EN | 339 | |
Vladan POPOVIĆ, Ivona KERKEZ | UDK 630* 164 + 165 (001) | |
POPULATION VARIABILITY OF WILD CHERRY (Prunus avium L.) IN SERBIA ACCORDING TO THE LEAF MORPHOLOGY pdf HR EN | 347 | |
PRETHODNO PRIOPĆENJE | ||
Taylan OCALAN | UDK 630* 582 | |
ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF GPS PRECISE POINT POSITIONING (PPP) TECHNIQUE USING DIFFERENT WEB-BASED ONLINE SERVICES IN A FOREST ENVIRONMENT pdf HR EN | 357 | |
Sevgin ÖZDERN,Hüseyin FAKR, Emrah DÖNMEZ | UDK 630* 813 | |
CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF HAWTHORN (Crataegus L. spp.) TAXA NATURALLY DISTRIBUTED IN WESTERN ANATOLIA PART OF TURKEY pdf HR EN | 369 | |
STRUČNI ČLANCI | ||
Ivo AŠČIĆ | UDK 630* 945.2 | |
NUMISMATICS AS AN EDUCATIONAL AND PROMOTIONAL TOOL IN FORESTRY pdf HR EN | 377 | |