DIGITALNA ARHIVA ŠUMARSKOG LISTA
prilagođeno pretraživanje po punom tekstu



ŠUMARSKI LIST 9-10/2017 str. 34     <-- 34 -->        PDF

Erdaş, O., H.H. Acar, M. Eker, 2014: Forest transportation technique. Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Forestry, Trabzon. 504 p.
FAO, 2011: Guide to implementation of phytosanitary standards in forestry. FAO Forestry Paper 164. Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i2080e/i2080e.pdf.
Gavrilov, T.А., T.B. Stankevich, O.А. Anpilogova, G.N. Kolesnikov, L.A. Chernyaev, 2016: Debarking waste processing: a systematic review. Resources and Technology 13(3):71-77. DOI: 10.15393/j2.art.2016.3521
Gülci, N., 2014: Researches on precision forestry in forest planning. Phd thesis, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Faculty of Forestry, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey. 264 p.
Gürtan, H., 1969: Die arbeitsleistungen verschiedener axte und schaleisen bei der entrindung. Forestry Research Institute in Ankara, Technical Bulletin, 38: 66.
Kayri, M., 2009: The multiple comparison (post-hoc) techniques to determine the difference between groups in researches. Fırat University Journal of Social Science 19(1):51-64.
Magagnotti, N., C. Nati, L. Pari, R. Spinelli, R. Visser, 2011: Assessing the cost of stump-site debarking in eucalypt plantations. Biosys Eng. 110:443–449.
Manavakun, N., 2014: Harvesting operations in eucalyptus plantations in Thailand. Dissertationes Forestales 177. Department of Forest Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Helsinki. 111 p. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14214/df.177.
Marshall, H.M., G.E. Murphy, B. Gartner, 2006: Effect of bark thickness estimates on optimal log merchandizing. For Prod J. 56:87-92.
Murphy, G., M. Acuna, 2016: Effect of harvesting season, system and equipment on in-forest Pinus radiata bark removal in Australia and New Zealand. International Journal of Forest Engineering. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2016.1253269.
OGM, 1996: The notification of harvesting activities in wood-based forest products (Notification Number: 288), General Directorate of Forestry of Turkey, Ankara.
Spinelli, R., S. Ward, P. Owende, 2009: A harvest and transport cost model for Eucalyptus spp. fast-growing short rotation plantations. Biomass and Bioenergy, 33:1265-1270.
Yıldırım, M., 1987: Time study assessment in forest operations. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University 37(3):67-85.
Yıldırım, M., 1989: Work science in forestry. İstanbul University Faculty of Forestry, İstanbul. 287 p.
Watson, W.F., A.A. Twaddle, J.B. Hudson, 1993: Review of chain flail delimbing-debarking. Journal of Forest Engineering, 4(2):37-52.
SAŽETAK
U Turskoj se faze koranja drveta obično obavljaju uz pomoć sjekira. Međutim, ta metoda zahtijeva puno vremena i puno radne snage. Uz to, budući da ostavljanje drveta s korom u sastojinama povećava rizik od oštećenja insektima, zahtijeva hitan proces guljenja kore. Posljednjih godina puno se koriste guljači kore koji se montiraju na motornu pilu, budući da se posao obavlja brže s manjim brojem radne snage. U ovoj studiji, analizirane su dvije različite metode koranja u razmatranju produktivnosti rada koje uključuju uporabu sjekira i guljač kore koji se montira na motornu pilu. Terenske studije provedene su u sastojini brucijskog bora (Pinus brutia Ten.) koja se nalazi u Upravi šuma Bahçe u regionalnom šumskom gospodarstvu Adane. Rezultat studije bio je da je produktivnost pila za koranje bila pet puta veća od uporabe sjekira za koranje. Tako je guljač kore koji se montira na motornu pilu bolja alternativa od uporabe sjekire u guljenju kore, budući da je kod njega potrebno manje vremena te smanjuje fizički rad drvosječa.
KLJUČNE RIJEČI: Šumski radovi, koranje, guljač kore koji se montira na motornu pilu, produktivnost guljenja kore