DIGITALNA ARHIVA ŠUMARSKOG LISTA
prilagođeno pretraživanje po punom tekstu



ŠUMARSKI LIST 11-12/2013 str. 15     <-- 15 -->        PDF

3. Slijedom prethodnog zaključka, u teksturnoj interpretaciji, pomoću teksturnog trokuta, između istraživanih metoda pojavljuju se značajne razlike. Od 67 uzoraka u < 10 % dobili smo jednaku teksturnu oznaku. Ove razlike smatramo vrlo bitnim za razumijevanje značajki tla za korisnika dotičnih podataka.
Literatura
References
Allen, T., M. G. Baudet, 1977: The limits of gravitational sedimentation, Powder Technolgy 19, pp. 131–138.
Beulselinck, L., G. Govers, J. Poesen, G. Degraer, L. Froyen, 1998: Grain-size analysis by laser diffractometry: comparision with sieve-pipette method, Catena 32, pp. 193–208.
Buurman, P., T. Pape, C. C Mugler, 1997: Laser grain-sizedetermination in soil genetic studies. 1. Practical problems, Soil Science 162, pp. 211–218.
Cooper, L. R., R. L Haverland, D. M. Hendricks, W. G. Knisel, 1984: Microtac particle-size analyzer: an alternative particlesize determination method for sediment and soils, Soil Science 138, pp. 138–146.
Di Stefano, C. Ferro, V. Mirabile, S. 2010: Comparison between grain-size analyses using laser diffraction and sedimentation methods. Biosystem engieneering 10 (2010). pp. 205–215.
Gee, G. W., J. W Bauder, 1986: Particle – size analysis, In: Klute A. (ed.): Methods of Soil Analysis. No. 9, Part 1 in the series Agronomy, pp. 383–411.
Gee, G. W., D. Or, 2002: Particle-size analysis. In: J. H. Dane & G. C. Topp (Eds.), Soil Science Society of America Book Series: Vol. 5, Methods of soil analysis. Part 4. Physical methods, pp. 255–293.
FAO, 2006: Guidelens for soil description, pp. 25–29.
ISO 11277, 2009: Soil quality –Determination of particle size distribution in mineral soil material – Method by sieving and sedimentation.
ISO 11464, 2006: Soil quality – Pretreatment of samples for physico-chemical analysis.
Kettler, T. A., W. J Doran, T. L Gilbert, 2001: Simplified Method for Soil Particle-Size Determination to Accompany Soil-Quality Analyses, Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty. pp. 305.
Konert, M., J. Vanderberghe, 2007: Comparasion of laser grain size analysis with pipette and sieve analysis: a solution for the underestimation of the clay fraction, Sedimentology (1997) 44, pp. 523–535.
Loveland, P. G., W. R. Whalley, 2001: Particle size analysis. In: Smith K.A, Mullins C.E. (eds.): Soil and Environmental Analysis. Physical Methods. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.
Mattthews, M. D., 1991: The effect of grain shape and density on size measurement. In: Principles, Methods, and Application of Particle Size Analysis. J. P. M. Syvitski (ed.) Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp. 22–33.
Minasny, B., A. B. McBratney, 2001: The Australian soil texture boomerang: a comparison of the Australian and USA/FAO soil particle-size classification systems. Australian Journal of Soil Research 39, pp. 1443–1451.
Minasny, B., A. B. McBratney, K. L. Bristow, 1999: Comparision of different approaches to the development of pedotransfer functions for water-retention curves, Geoderma 93, pp. 225–253.
Shein, E. V., 2009: The Particle-Size Distribution in Soils: Problems of the Methods of Study, Interpretation of the Results, and Classification., Eurasian Soil Science, 2009, Vol. 42, pp. 284–291.
Shein, E. V., E. Yu. Milanovskii, A. Z. Molov, 2006: The Effect of Organic Matter on the Difference between Particle-Size Distribution Data Obtained by the Sedimentometric and Laser Diffraction Methods ISSN 1064-2293, Eurasian Soil Science, 2006, Vol. 39, Suppl. 1, pp. 84–90.
Syvitski, J. P. M., K. W. G. LeBlanc, K. W. Asprey, 1991: Inter laboratory, instrument calibration experiment. In: Principles, Methods, and Application of Particle Size analysis (Ed. by J. P. M. Syvitski), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 119–128.
Škorić, A., 1965: Pedološki praktikum (Pedology guide), Zagreb 1965, pp. 18–23.
Wen, B., A. Aydin, N. S. Duzgoren-Aydin, 2002: A comparative study of particle size analyses by sieve-hydrometer and laser diffraction methods. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 25, pp. 434–442.
Xu, R., 2002: Particle Characterization: Light Scattering Methods. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, NY.
Comparison of two sieving and sedimentation methods for determination of particle size distribution – possibilities and limitations of interpretation
Summary
The purpose of this research was to comparison of two sieving and sedimentation methods for determination of particle size distribution (PSD). Until 2009, PSD was determined at the Faculty of Forestry in Zagreb by a sieve and pipette method after soil preparation using Na-pyrophosphate according to the Pedological manual (old method) (Škorić, 1965). Since the opening of the ecological-pedological laboratory at the Forestry Faculty in 2009, PSD determination has been performed according to the ISO 11277 (2009) Standard. The most important difference between the two methods is that according to the ISO 11227 Standard, pre-treatment is accomplished with hydrogen peroxide which oxidizes the organic matter, so that PSD is determined only in mineral soil particles, while according to the old method, the organic matter was not removed at PSD determination.