DIGITALNA ARHIVA ŠUMARSKOG LISTA
prilagođeno pretraživanje po punom tekstu
| ŠUMARSKI LIST 13/2011 str. 25 <-- 25 --> PDF |
J. Medak: ŠUME PITOMOG KESTENAS PRASEĆIM ZELJEM (Aposeri foetidae-Castanetum sativae ... Šumarski list – Posebni broj CXXXV (2011), 5-24 Martinović, J., Z. Pelcer, 1986: Šumske zajednica i tla šumskog gospodarstva Sisak. Svezak 3. Šumarski institut, Jastrebarsko. Matović,M., 1995: Ekološke karakteristike šuma pitomog kestena (Castanea sativaMill.) na staništima u Srbiji. Zaštita prirode 46/47: 77–85, Beograd. Medak,J., 2004: Fitocenološke značajke šuma pitomog kestena u sjeverozapadnoj Hrvatskoj. Magistarski rad. Šumarski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. Medak,J., 2009: Šumske zajednice i staništa pitomog kestena (Castanea sativaMill.) u Hrvatskoj. Disertacija. Šumarski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu. NovakAgbaba,S., 2006: Monitoring raka kore pitomog kestena na trajnim plohama. Rad. Šumar. Inst. Izvanredno izdanje 9: 199–211, Jastrebarsko. Poorbabaei,H., 2007: Study on woody species diversity in the sweet chestnut (Castanea sativaL.) forests, Guilan, Iran.International conference on th th mathematical biology (Icmb07), 4 – 6 sept. equatorial Bangi-Putrajaya hotel, Malaysia. Rexhepi, F., 1991: Fitocenoza oraha i pitomog kestena (Juglando-castanetum sativae Rexhepi 1990) na Kosovu. Zbornik radova sa simpozijuma Nedeljko Košanin i botaničke nauke: 98–105. Regula-Bevilacqua, Lj., 1978: Biljni pokrov Strahinščice u Hrvatskom zagorju. Disertacija, Sveučilište u Zagrebu. Sučić, J.1953: Rasprostranjenost pitomog kestena na području Bosne i Hercegovine. Narodni šumar, br. 9–10, Sarajevo. Šegulja,N., 1979: Šumska vegetacijaVukomeričkih gorica. Drugi kongres ekologa Jugoslavije ii: 1115–1132. Šegulja,N., Lj. Ilijanić,Lj. Marković,1998: Prikaz i analiza flore Zrinske gore.Acta botanica Croatica 55/56: 65–99. Šilić,Č., 2005:Atlas dendroflore Bosne i Hercegovine. Matica hrvatska Čitluk. Škorić,A., 1973: Pedološki praktikum. Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Poljoprivredni fakultet. Šugar,I., 1972: Biljni svijet Samoborskog gorja. Disertacija, Sveučilište u Zagrebu. Trinajstić, I., 1995: Samoborsko gorje, a refuge of various floral elements between the alps and the Dinaric Mountains. Acta Botanica Croatica 54: 47–62. Velev,V.,2007: Structure of the chestnut communities (Castanea sativa Mill.) in belasitza mountain and a conception regarding the dynamic processes that go off in them. sustainable management of sweet chestnut ecosystems-cast bul. Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria. Vukelić,J., 1991: Šumske zajednice i staništa hrasta kitnjaka. Glasnik za šumske pokuse 27:1–82. Vukelić,J., D.Baričević I.Šapić,2010: Nomen clatural- phytocoenological analysis of the as sociationpotentillo micranthae-quercetum petra eae Ass. nova in Croatia. Hacquetia 9/1: 5–18. Weber, H. E., J. Moravec & J.-P. Theurillat, 2000: International code of phytosociological nomenclature. 3rd edition. Journal of vegetation science 11 (5): 739–768. Wraber,M., 1957: Biljnosociološki prikaz kestenovih šuma Bosne i Hercegovine, godišnjak Biološkog instituta Univerziteta u Sarajevu XI(1958). Sarajevo. Zupančič, M., 1999: Smrekovi gozdovi Slovenije. Sazu, dela 36: 1–222. Flora Croatica Database http://hirc.botanic.hr/fcd/search.aspxBotaničkizavod, Prirodoslovno-matematički fakultet, Sveučilište u Zagrebu. Forets a Castanea sativa http://inpn.mnhn.fr/docs/cahab/fiches/9260.pdf SUMMARY: This paper describes a new association of mesophilous sweet chestnut forests with odorous pig-salad (Aposeri foetidae-Castanetum sativaeass. nova) in Croatia. The association is the most frequently found at altitudes 200–400 m, which refers to sites at Zrinska and Petrova gora, or higher (up to 600 meters at Medvednica, Žumberak), in both cases in transitional positions between oak and beech or in the beech belt. It occurs on northern and eastern expositions and less steep slopes (up to 20°), which distinguish it very good from the well known acidophilous sweet chestnut forests (Querco-Castanetum sativae), which occurs at southern and more steep slopes. The most common soil type in this community is luvisol, deep and very acid to light acid, depending on subassociation. It is characterized by considerably larger number of mesophilous species from beech forests than acidophilous and thermophilous species. Phytosociological releves were collected following the principles of standard Braun-Blanquet method. In Phytosociological Table 1 there are 20 relevés of the association Aposeri foetidae-Castanetum sativae. Sweet chestnut is frequently accompanied by beech and hornbeam in the tree layer. Oak is also frequent but without important and significant role that it plays in acidophilous chestnut forests. |