DIGITALNA ARHIVA ŠUMARSKOG LISTA
prilagođeno pretraživanje po punom tekstu



ŠUMARSKI LIST 5-6/2007 str. 33     <-- 33 -->        PDF

M. Prka, A. P. B. Krpan: PROBLEM ODREĐIVANJA SORTIMENTNE STRUKTURE JEDNODOBNIH . Šumarski list br. 5-6, CXXXI (2007), 219-235
P a la d i ni ć , E., D. Vu l et i ć 2006: Modeliranje sorti-Štefančić, A. 1998: Udio drvnih sortimenata u volumentne
strukture dubećih stabala bukve, “Radomenu
krupnog drva do 7 cm promjera za običnu
vi” Izvanredno izdanje 9, Šumarski institut Ja-bukvu u jednodobnim sastojinama, “Šumarski
strebarsko, Jastrebarsko, 279–296. –337.


list” 7–8/1998., Zagreb, 329–337.


Pranjić, A., N. Lukić 1997: Izmjera šuma, Udžbe-Ugrenović, A. 1957: Eksploatacija
aacij šuma,Udžbeninici
Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Zagreb, 42, 105–113, ci Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Zagreb.
186–190, 258–260. Vondra, V. 1995: Usporedne analize postojećih mo


Prka, M. 2001: Udio i kakvoća šumskih drvnih sorti-dela za procjenu očekivanih obujmova sječivog
menata u oplodnim sječama bukovih sastojina etata u jednodobnim šumama u Hrvatskoj – dija-
Bjelovarske Bilogore, Sveučilište u Zagrebu, gnostička studija, ZIŠ, Šumarski fakultet sveuči-
Magistarski rad, Šumarski fakultet, Zagreb, lišta u Zagrebu, Zagreb, 1–47.


45–47. Vuletić, D. 1999: Prilog poznavanju sortimentne


Prka, M. 2003: Vrijednosne značajke bukovih stabala strukture hrasta lužnjaka (Quercus robur L.) u
prema vrsti sijeka u sječinama Bjelovarske BiloEGT-
u II-G-11, “Radovi”, Vol. 34, 2–1999, Šugore,
“Šumarski list” 1–2/2003., Zagreb, 35–44. marski institut Jastrebarsko, Jastrebarsko, 5–20.


Prka, M. 2005: Čimbenici kakvoće bukovih stabala i Anon., 1995: Hrvatske norme proizvoda iskorištavastruktura
sortimenata iz prorednih i oplodnih nja šuma. II izdanje, Državni zavod za normizasječina
Bjelovarske Bilogore, Disertacija, Šu-ciju i mjeriteljstvo, Zagreb.


marski fakultet sveučilišta u Zagrebu, 42–62. Anon, 1999: Hrvatska norma. Oblo drvo listača –


Prka, M. 2006: Značajke doznačenih bukovih stabala Razvrstavanje po kakvoći – 1 dio: Hrast i bukva
po vrsti sijeka u sječinama Bjelovarske Bilogore (EN 1316-1:1997); I izdanje, Državni zavod za
i utjecaj na strukturu sortimenata, “Šumarski normizaciju i mjeriteljstvo, Zagreb, 1–4.


list” 7–8/2006., Zagreb, 319–329. Anon, 2003: Osnova gospodarenja “Bjelovarska Bilo


Stewart, I. 2003: Kocka li se Bog? Nova matematika gora”. Važeća od 1. 1. 2003. – 31. 12. 2012., Hrkaosa,
Naklada Jesenski i Turk, Zagreb, vatske šume, Uprava šuma Podružnica Bjelovar.
318–321, 335–353, 436.


SUMMARY: The subject of research was probability of appearance of technical roundwood
timber assortments in trees according to type of felling, as well as the difference between shares
of technical roundwood timber assortments according to diameter class and type of felling. The
percentages of technical roundwood established in this research were compared to the planned
values (assortment tables) which are applied in forestry operational bodies. Research was carried
out on a sample consisting of 787 trees in thinning felling, 1025 trees in preparatory felling,
606 trees in seeding felling and 583 trees in final felling. An overall number of 3001 exemplary
trees were included in the research. The age of the felling areas studied was between 59 and 91
years in the preliminary yield (thinning), 94 to 110 years in preparatory felling, 100 to 112 years
in seeding felling, and 98 to 112 years in final felling areas.


We think that the approach to establishing the assortment structure of even-aged beech
stands taken so far is to a large extent wrong. The operative assortment tables give too high estimates
of top quality timber assortments of all types of felling, except the final felling of seeding
beech felling areas. Timber assortment tables that take into consideration the type of felling as
one of the inputs, enable a more reliable estimate of assortment structure of the felling area and
more precise planning of timber mass marked for felling. In this case, as a distinguishing factor,
we took the selection criterion for marking trees for felling which is applied for the types up to,
and including, the preparatory felling. For that reason, timber assortment tables were made separately
for thinning and preparatory felling, and separately for seeding and final felling.


On the basis of the research results, new assortment tables were made according to Croatian
Standards of Forest Exploitation Products from 1995. Seeding and final felling show by ca 8–14 %
higher shares of top quality timber assortment (F and L) than thinning and preparatory felling. On
the other side, thinning and preparatory felling show by ca 4–15 % higher shares of technical roundwood
assortment of lower quality (second-class and third-class) than seeding and final felling.


Key words: common beech, assortment structure, timber assortment tables, even-aged
beech stands