DIGITALNA ARHIVA ŠUMARSKOG LISTA
prilagođeno pretraživanje po punom tekstu




ŠUMARSKI LIST 9-10/2005 str. 22     <-- 22 -->        PDF

D. Ballian, Ž. Škvorc, J. Franjić, D. Kajba, S. Bogdan, F. Bogunić: PROCJENA NEKIH MOFOLOŠKIH . Šumarski list br. 9–10, CXXIX (2005), 475-480
LITERATURA – References


Av o li o , S. 1984: Il pino loricato (Pinus leucodermis Mirov, N. T., 1967: The genus Pinus. Ronald Press
Ant.). Ant. Ist. Sper. Selv., 17: 79–153. Company, New York.


Bogunić, F. 2004: Molekularno citogenetička difeP
op n ik o la , N., 1975: Varijabilnost broja smolnih
rencijacija i veličina genoma vrsta Pinus hel-kanala u četinama munike (Pinus heldreichii
draichii Christ. i Pinus nigra Arnold. MagistarChrist.).
Simpozijum o munici, Peć 4–7.9. 1975,
ski rad – Prirodno matematički fakultet Univer334–
344.


ziteta u Sarajevu – odsjek za Biologiju, str. 65. P o pni k o l a , N., 1978: Anatomske karakteristike četi-


Boscherini, G., M. Morgante, P. Rossi, G. G. na varijeteta munike (Pinus heldraichii Christ.) u
Vendramin, 1994: Allozyme and chloroplast prirodnim populacijama na Balkanskom polu-
DNA variation in Italian and Greek population ostrvu. Šum. list 102 (1–3): 25–39.


of Pinus leucodermis. Heredity 73: 284–290. Sokal, R. R., J. F. Rohlf, 1989: Biometry. Freeman
Đorđeva, M., M. Stamenkov, A. Gudevski, and Co., San Francisco.


1975: Neke osobine semena i šišarki munike S t i l i n ov i ć , S., A. Tuc o v ić , 1972: Viviparousness
(Pinus heldraichii Christ.), Simpozijum o muni-in Pinus heldraichii Christ. Genetika 4 (2):
ci (Pinus heldraichii Christ.), Dečani 4–7.9. 193–200.
1972, 115–121.


Tuc o v i ć , A., S. St i l i no v ić , 1975: Prilog poznavaFukarek,
P., M. Vidaković, 1965: Nalaz prelazne nju semenošenja munike. Simpozijum o munici


ili hibridne svojte borova (Pinus nigradermis (Pinus heldraichii Christ.), Dečani 4–7.9. 1972,
Fuk. et Vid.) na planini Prenju u Hercegovini. 374–384.
Naućno društvo Bosne i Hercegovine, Radovi 28


Tuc o v i ć , A., S. S t il i n o v i ć, 1977: Osobenosti os


(8): 68–87.


novnih fenoloških pojava stabala munike izvan
Jo v a n ov i ć , B., 2000: Dendrologija. Univerzitetska prirodnog areala. Glasn. Šum. Fak. Beograd –
štampa, Beograd, str. 536. Jubilarni br. 52: 63–82.
McGarigal, K., S. Cushman, S. Stafford, 2000: Vidaković, M., J. Franjić, 2005: Golosjemenja-
Multivariate Statistics for Wildlife and Ecology če. Sveučilište u Zagrebu – Šumarski fakultet.
Research. Springer-Verlag, New York. Zagreb, str. 824.


SUMMARY: Distribution range of whitebark pine (Pinus heldreichii) naturally
covers areas of the Balkan and Apenine Peninsulas, predominantly consisting of
impassable rocky slopes, 800–2500 metres above the sea level. This is a Tertiary
relict and endemic species of European flora. Geographically remote and disjunctively
distributed natural populations of whitebark pine found in the countries of the
Balkan and Apenine Peninsulas represent slowly disappearing genetic particularities.
Efficacy of the mesures intended for conservation of whitebark pine depend upon
the extent of our knowledge of its genetic biodiversity, thus, the intention of this paper
is to assess variability of certain morphological characteristics of cones and seeds in
some natural populations of whitebark pine. Current situation found at certain localities
does not benefit survival of whitebark pine, since natural processes of succession
restrict areas suitable for its growth and development. Since these are small populations
that had probably been interconnected after the last glaciation, and are now
isolated, it can be assumed that they are governed by certain internal selection
processes. Still, the time span starting with their separation is relatively short, and no
greater differentiation has occurred. In this case, we can also assume the occurrence
of conservative processes characterized by maintenance of the same genepool generation
after generation, as the only genepool forced by natural selection. On the other
hand, natural selection eliminates those individuals leaning toward progression, thus
directly resulting in smaller variability among populations. The only possible way of
protection of this valuable endemic and relict species in a currently altered ecological
situation is in conducting of morphological and phenological studies, biochemical
analyses, and results based creation of in situ and ex situ archives.


Key words: Whitebark pine, Pinus heldreichii, morphology, Bosnia and
Hercegovina