DIGITALNA ARHIVA ŠUMARSKOG LISTA
prilagođeno pretraživanje po punom tekstu
| ŠUMARSKI LIST 9-10/1999 str. 78 <-- 78 --> PDF |
A. Tustonjić, .1. Pavclić. N. Farkaš-Topolnik, I. Đuričić-Kuric: ŠUME UNUTAR PROSTOR. PLANA ZGB. ŽUPANIJI; Šumarski liši br. 9 10. CXXIII (1999).469-4X5 ostalih prostora vršnog centralnog područja i loŠGO GJ "Črnovščak" - u izradi kaliteta Brestovac. Šumarski fakultet Sveučilišta ŠGO GJ "Duboki jarak" - u izradi u Zagrebu. Zagreb. ŠGO GJ "Zelinske šume", važnost 1993-2002, god. Schneider- Jacoby M. & Ern H. 1993: Park priŠGO GJ "Žutica" - u izradi rode Lonjsko polje. Hrvatsko ekološko društvo, Zagreb. ŠGO GJ "Veliki Jantak", važnost 1992.-2001. god. ŠGO GJ "Limbuš-Sava", važnost 1991-2000. god. ŠGO GJ "Čret-Varoški lug", važnost 1991.-2000. god. ŠGO GJ "Bistranska gora" - u izradi ŠGO GJ "Marča", važnost 1992.-2001. god. ŠGO GJ "Žumberak- Novoselska gora", važnost Programi za gospodarenje privatnim šumama 1993-2002. god. Hrvatsko šumarsko društvo: 1998: Šume Medvednice ŠGO GJ "Kal- Javorac", važnost 1991-2000, god. jučer-danas-sutra, Zagreb. ŠGO GJ "Tepec- Palačnik- Stražnik", važnost Urbanistički zavod grada Zagreba: 1988: Prostorni plan 1995-2004. god. Medvednica, Zagreb. ŠGO GJ "Turopoljski lug", važnost 1995-2004. god. Republički zavod za zaštitu prirode: 1979: Park prirode ŠGO GJ "Šiljakovačka Dubrava II", važnost "Medvednica"-studija zaštite prirode-, Zagreb. 1994-2003. god. Zbornik radova savjetovanja: Privatne šume u HrvatŠGO GJ "Vukomeričke Gorice II", važnost skoj u ozračju Helsinške konferencije o zaštiti i 1995-2004. god. očuvanju europskih šuma, Zagreb, 1994. g. ŠGO GJ "Stupnički i Obreški lug", važnost Šumarski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu: 1997: Gospo1990- 1999. god. darenje šumama i šumskim prostorom na poŠGO GJ "Lučko- Ježdovec", važnost 1990- 1999. god. dručju grada Zagreba i Zagrebačke županije, ŠGO GJ "Savski vrbaci", važnost 1990- 1999. god. Zagreb. SUMMARY: The paper gives an overview of the area under state forests managed by the Forest Office Zagreb. Those forests are partly located in the area of County of Zagreb. Protective and transitional zones have been proposed with the following objectives: to lossen conflicts of interest between civil eingineering and forestry, ensure access to forests, and preserve the diversity of natural resources to counterbalance an increasing urbanisation of Zagreb surroundings, industrialization, developement of communications and other prossures on undeveloped land. Certain possibilities can be found in registering, preserving and managing private forests, especially when linked to state forests or when representing larger units. The proposals for forest protection involve a ban on building forest roads, changing the purpose of forests or distributing forest edges. To satisfy building conditions 50 m away from the edge, guidelines issued by the Forest Enterprise should be followed, and where possible, building should be banned by the regional plan (the paper proposes forest units). The existing building activities should be retained within the given dimensions so that they conform to the surroundings. Building in the protected forest zone should not be allowed. Private plots in the vicinity of forests should not be fenced off Forests protected by the Nature Protection Act (Nature Parks, Park Forests, Important Landscapes and other facilities) must be managed on a professional basis. The degree of protection may affect management Methods and Intensity, but the fundamental forestry principles (tending and regeneration) remain the same. The basic phenomenon should be zoned. This implies management methods in certain forest complexes in terms of the ecological functions to be en- chanced. |