DIGITALNA ARHIVA ŠUMARSKOG LISTA
prilagođeno pretraživanje po punom tekstu



ŠUMARSKI LIST 1-2/1989 str. 70     <-- 70 -->        PDF

organizational forms in forestry with the aim to impose limits or to impose no
limits at all on forestry enterprises in their free utilization of this specific means
of production.


2. Competetive bidding for the right to use and cultivate forests is not feasible
because of the nature and deadlines set on such jobs. The proposed method
strengthens the author´s opinion that Professor R. Sabadi does not understand
the essence of the problem.
The proposed organizational structure does not solve the problem of guarding
and taking care of forests. Accordingly, the proposed organization is insufficiently
worked out, uneconomical and worse than the Forestry Act of 1983,
which is considered by the majority of experts to be the worst one possible.


3. Contrary to the proposed organization of the Republic Forestry Commission,
Regional Forestry Administrations and the National Forestry Fund advocated
by Professor R. Sabadi, which basically means not only the separation of
biological forest reproduction from forest utilization but also the division of
forestry jobs in biological forest reproduction into those involved in competetive
bidding and those contracting jobs, the present author proposes the following:
(a) The establishment of »basic management units« comprising from 30,000
to 80,000 hectares.
(b) The organization of »associated forestry management enterprises«, i. e.
forestry enterprises comprising from 200,000 to 300,000 hectares. Such an associated
forestry management enterprise would be responsible for the expansion of
production capacity, development and other specialized business operatins. Therefore,
the level of »basic management units«, i. e. individual enterprises are too
limited in scope to justify the organization of such business operations and tasks.