DIGITALNA ARHIVA ŠUMARSKOG LISTA
prilagođeno pretraživanje po punom tekstu
ŠUMARSKI LIST 1-3/1975 str. 24 <-- 24 --> PDF |
On the basis of an analysis of recording the activity of workers in felling and primary conversion the following conclusions may be drawn: 1) When recording the work by the work sampling method the observer is more engaged than when timing the respective work by the stop-watch time study method. 2) A stop-watch time study recording of measured data is more complex than that in the work sampling method. 3) The structure of the work time established by the work sampling method almost equiablled the structure established by the stop-watch time study method. 4) With work sampling in felling and primary conversion — when applying variable observation intervals established according to the table of random numbers — are not achieved results more accurate than the corresponding recording at isochronous observation intervals. 5) The best results of recording by the investigated variants of the work sampling method we obtained when isochronous obseration intervals of 30 seconds were employed. 6) The work place times according to the units of converted assortment — established by work sampling method with isochronous observation intervals of 30 seconds — are sufficiently reliable. 7) Times participating with a small percentage in the work place time have not been established statisticaly in a satisfactory manner when employing the mentioned variants of the work sampling method. This may turn out to be an important drawback when employing the work sampling method in the setting up of work place times differentiated according to the operations. |