DIGITALNA ARHIVA ŠUMARSKOG LISTA
prilagođeno pretraživanje po punom tekstu




ŠUMARSKI LIST 3-4/1965 str. 9     <-- 9 -->        PDF

EFFECT OF SOME LEPIDOPTEROUS DEFOLIATORS ON THE DIAMETER
INCREMENT OF PEDUNCULATE OAK


By Dr. Dušan Klepac and Dr. Ivan Spaić


In Šumarski List (»Forestry Review«) 1949, pp. 280—290 there was described a
method for determining the loss of increment brought about in stands attacked by
the Gipsy Moth (Lymantria dispar L.). In one experimental area (sub-compartment
No. 150a, management unit »Josip Kozarac«, forest district Lipovljani) it was established
that the annual volume increment of Pedunculate Oak in 1956 dropped by
ca. 30´Vo after an attack of the Gipsy Moth (Klepa c 1959). One year later, i.e. in
1957, the volume increment of Pedunculate Oak dropped by even more. This can be
explained by the fact that for the building up of increment in one year the reserve
substances which were formed in the preceding year are decisive. But as regards the
above-mentioned case one should not forget that in 1957 Gipsy Moth caterpillars
continued defoliating Oak tree crowns in the investigated stand because the control
operation was performed a little too late Besides the Gipsy Moth there were noticed
in the same year also the Lackey Moth (Malacosoma neustria) and the Oak Processionary
Moth (Thaumetopoea processionea).


There have passed 6 years from the first experiment ,and we would like to know
how Pedunculate Oak reacted in the years folowing, i. e. from 1957 to 1963.


In this paper we would like to give an answer to this question.


For the mentioned purpose we extracted in spring 1964 by means of an increment
borer 100 cores from 100 Oak trees from different sites and of different diameters
b. h. These trees were chosen in the sub-compartment No. 150a, menagemen!
unit »Josip Kozarac«, i. e. in the same stand where the first experiment was carried
out 6 years ago. Each increment core was analysed, so that we measured the growth-
ring width in the following years: 1958, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, and 1963. On sorting
out the measured data we computed the arithmetic mean of the growth-ring width (g)
in individual years and its standard deviation (a). These data are presented in Tab 1.
It should be stated that we had measured the data for 1955, 1956, and 1957 at an
earlier date, i. e. during the first experiment.


Tab. 1
Mean width of growth ring (g) of Pedunculate Oak from sub-compartment No. 150a,
management unit »Josip Kozarac«, for individual years


Year 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963
g in m. m. 2.52 1.63 1.43 2.07 1.92 1.41 1.79 1.66 1.49
a in m. m. ±1.03 ±0.75 ±0.75 ±0.94 ±0.85 ±0.67 ±0.96 ±1.00 ±0.84


What do the measured data concerning the mean growth-ring width in the investigated
stand show us?


Conspicuous is the drop in the ring width in 1956, 1957, 1960, and 1963.


The drop in the diameter increment in 1956 and 1957 was caused by the Gipsy
Moth, which in 1956 defoliated completely the investegated stands, while in 1957 it
did not appear in any greater numbers until 1964. The stand recovered, which manifested
itself in the diameter increment in 1958 and 1959. But in 1960 we again noticed
a drcip in the diameter increment. Whereas in 1958 the average growth-ring width
was ca. 2 m. m., it dropped in 1960 to 1.41 m. m., i. e. by 30!:Vo. Which would mean that
the volume increment in that year also decreased by ca. 3Ö´/o. In the following two
years the diameter increment increased only slightly, and in 1963 it dropped again,
although not so appreciably as in 1960.


What would account for the drop in the increment in 1960 and 1963?
This refers us to the climatic factors, which were probably not the cause of the
drop in the increment of Pedunculate Oak in 1960 and 1963. That this is actually so,
is borne out by data on the precipitation and temperatures, which in these and the
preceding years (i.e.: 1959, 1960, 1962, and 1963) were not less unfavourable than in
other years.
Besides, in 1950, 1960, 1962, and 1963 were recorded no special weather inclemencies;
in those years there occurred no full Oak masts.


9!)